Home About HyMeX
Motivations
Science questions
Observation strategy
Modelling strategy
Target areas
Key documents
Organisation
International coordination
Working groups
Task teams
National contributions
Endorsements
Resources
Database
Data policy
Publications
Education and summer schools
Drifting balloons (BAMED)
SOP web page
Google maps data visualisation
Workshops Projects
ASICS-MED
MOBICLIMEX
MUSIC
IODA-MED
REMEMBER
FLOODSCALE
EXAEDRE
PICS
Offers Links Contacts
Science & Task teams
Science teams
Task teams
Implementation plan
Coordination
International Scientific Steering Committee (ISSC)
Executive Committee for Implementation and Science Coordination (EC-ISC)
Executive Committee - France (EC-Fr)
HyMeX France
HyMeX Italy
HyMeX Spain
Archive
by Dunić, Natalija, Vilibić, Ivica, Šepić, Jadranka, Mihanović, Hrvoje, Sevault, Florence, Somot, Samuel, Waldman, Robin, Nabat, Pierre, Arsouze, Thomas, Pennel, Romain, Jordà, Gabriel and Precali, Robert
Abstract:
A performance study of seven regional ocean configurations based on NEMO has been carried out for the Adriatic Sea over a common period (1980–2012). Assessed models differ in resolution, model physics, atmospheric forcing (forced vs. coupled models) and river discharges imposed within the Adriatic Sea. Models have been evaluated on the long-term temperature and salinity measurements in all of the Adriatic sub-basins, in particular within dense water collectors (Jabuka Pit and South Adriatic Pit) and dense water formation sites (northern and southern Adriatic). Adriatic-wide salinity content is mostly linked to the proper introduction of the overall water budget, rather than to the local river forcing. Forced models mostly overestimate temperature and salinity values. On average, coupled models better reproduce the thermohaline properties and processes, in particular the Adriatic-Ionian Bimodal Oscillating System (BiOS) reversals and its decadal variability. Wintertime heat losses are playing major role in defining the Adriatic Deep Water (ADW) transport rates in coupled models, while in forced models preconditioning in salinity is the most important factor. Further on, increase of resolution of the atmospheric forcing results in more realistic ocean behaviour, including dense water formation (DWF) in the complex coastal northern Adriatic. However, all models have large temperature biases and lower deep stratification at the dense water collector sites, indicating overall underrepresentation of the Adriatic DWF. Consequently, mixed-layer depth in the southern Adriatic is overestimated, reaching the bottom during some years. Ocean model resolution and river forcing seem to play a second-order role in defining the overall Adriatic-Ionian thermohaline properties, while inclusion of aerosol trend only slightly modified the BiOS reproduction.
Reference:
Dunić, Natalija, Vilibić, Ivica, Šepić, Jadranka, Mihanović, Hrvoje, Sevault, Florence, Somot, Samuel, Waldman, Robin, Nabat, Pierre, Arsouze, Thomas, Pennel, Romain, Jordà, Gabriel and Precali, Robert, 2019: Performance of multi-decadal ocean simulations in the Adriatic SeaOcean Modelling, 134, 84-109.
Bibtex Entry:
@Article{Dunic2019,
  author        = {Natalija Dunić and Ivica Vilibić and Jadranka Šepić and Hrvoje Mihanović and Florence Sevault and Samuel Somot and Robin Waldman and Pierre Nabat and Thomas Arsouze and Romain Pennel and Gabriel Jordà and Robert Precali},
  title         = {Performance of multi-decadal ocean simulations in the Adriatic Sea},
  journal       = {Ocean Modelling},
  year          = {2019},
  volume        = {134},
  pages         = {84-109},
  issn          = {1463-5003},
  abstract      = {A performance study of seven regional ocean configurations based on NEMO has been carried out for the Adriatic Sea over a common period (1980–2012). Assessed models differ in resolution, model physics, atmospheric forcing (forced vs. coupled models) and river discharges imposed within the Adriatic Sea. Models have been evaluated on the long-term temperature and salinity measurements in all of the Adriatic sub-basins, in particular within dense water collectors (Jabuka Pit and South Adriatic Pit) and dense water formation sites (northern and southern Adriatic). Adriatic-wide salinity content is mostly linked to the proper introduction of the overall water budget, rather than to the local river forcing. Forced models mostly overestimate temperature and salinity values. On average, coupled models better reproduce the thermohaline properties and processes, in particular the Adriatic-Ionian Bimodal Oscillating System (BiOS) reversals and its decadal variability. Wintertime heat losses are playing major role in defining the Adriatic Deep Water (ADW) transport rates in coupled models, while in forced models preconditioning in salinity is the most important factor. Further on, increase of resolution of the atmospheric forcing results in more realistic ocean behaviour, including dense water formation (DWF) in the complex coastal northern Adriatic. However, all models have large temperature biases and lower deep stratification at the dense water collector sites, indicating overall underrepresentation of the Adriatic DWF. Consequently, mixed-layer depth in the southern Adriatic is overestimated, reaching the bottom during some years. Ocean model resolution and river forcing seem to play a second-order role in defining the overall Adriatic-Ionian thermohaline properties, while inclusion of aerosol trend only slightly modified the BiOS reproduction.},
  copublication = {12: 5 Cro, 5 fr, 2 Es},
  doi           = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2019.01.006},
  keywords      = {Adriatic Sea, Regional ocean modelling, Model validation, Thermohaline properties, Dense water formation, Adriatic-Ionian Bimodal Oscillating System},
  owner         = {hymexw},
  timestamp     = {2019-01-25},
  url           = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1463500318301951},
}