Home About HyMeX
Motivations
Science questions
Observation strategy
Modelling strategy
Target areas
Key documents
Organisation
International coordination
Working groups
Task teams
National contributions
Endorsements
Resources
Database
Data policy
Publications
Education and summer schools
Drifting balloons (BAMED)
SOP web page
Google maps data visualisation
Workshops Projects
ASICS-MED
MOBICLIMEX
MUSIC
IODA-MED
REMEMBER
FLOODSCALE
EXAEDRE
Offers Links Contacts
Science & Task teams
Science teams
Task teams
Implementation plan
Coordination
International Scientific Steering Committee (ISSC)
Executive Committee for Implementation and Science Coordination (EC-ISC)
Executive Committee - France (EC-Fr)
HyMeX France
HyMeX Italy
HyMeX Spain
Archive
by Douinot, A., Roux, H., Garambois, P.-A. and Dartus, D.
Abstract:
A method of multiple working hypotheses was applied to a range of catchments in the Mediterranean area to analyse different types of possible flow dynamics in soils during flash flood events. The distributed, process-oriented model, MARINE, was used to test several representations of subsurface flows, including flows at depth in fractured bedrock and flows through preferential pathways in macropores. Results showed the contrasting performances of the submitted models, revealing different hydrological behaviours among the catchment set. The benchmark study offered a characterisation of the catchments' reactivity through the description of the hydrograph formation. The quantification of the different flow processes (surface and intra-soil flows) was consistent with the scarce in situ observations, but it remains uncertain as a result of an equifinality issue. The spatial description of the simulated flows over the catchments, made available by the model, enabled the identification of counterbalancing effects between internal flow processes, including the compensation for the water transit time in the hillslopes and in the drainage network. New insights are finally proposed in the form of setting up strategic monitoring and calibration constraints.
Reference:
Douinot, A., Roux, H., Garambois, P.-A. and Dartus, D., 2018: Using a multi-hypothesis framework to improve the understanding of flow dynamics during flash floodsHydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22, 5317-5340.
Bibtex Entry:
@Article{Douinot2018,
  Title                    = {Using a multi-hypothesis framework to improve the understanding of flow dynamics during flash floods},
  Author                   = {Douinot, A. and Roux, H. and Garambois, P.-A. and Dartus, D.},
  Journal                  = {Hydrology and Earth System Sciences},
  Year                     = {2018},

  Month                    = {October},
  Number                   = {10},
  Pages                    = {5317-5340},
  Volume                   = {22},

  Abstract                 = {A method of multiple working hypotheses was applied to a range of catchments in the Mediterranean area to analyse different types of possible flow dynamics in soils during flash flood events. The distributed, process-oriented model, MARINE, was used to test several representations of subsurface flows, including flows at depth in fractured bedrock and flows through preferential pathways in macropores. Results showed the contrasting performances of the submitted models, revealing different hydrological behaviours among the catchment set. The benchmark study offered a characterisation of the catchments' reactivity through the description of the hydrograph formation. The quantification of the different flow processes (surface and intra-soil flows) was consistent with the scarce in situ observations, but it remains uncertain as a result of an equifinality issue. The spatial description of the simulated flows over the catchments, made available by the model, enabled the identification of counterbalancing effects between internal flow processes, including the compensation for the water transit time in the hillslopes and in the drainage network. New insights are finally proposed in the form of setting up strategic monitoring and calibration constraints.},
  Copublication            = {4: 4 Fr},
  Doi                      = {10.5194/hess-22-5317-2018},
  Owner                    = {hymexw},
  Timestamp                = {2018.11.29},
  Url                      = {https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/22/5317/2018/}
}